|
Return To Main Page
March 25,
2024 World’s largest oil companies ‘way off track’ on emissions goals, report finds
Despite splashy climate pledges,
firms including BP and Saudi
In recent years, virtually all of the world’s
largest oil companies have made splashy climate pledges. But when it
comes to actually slashing emissions, those firms are “way off
track”, a new report has found. “Companies worldwide are publicly stating they are supportive of the goals of the Paris-Agreement, and claim to be part of the solution in accelerating the energy transition,” said Maeve O’Connor, analyst at Carbon Tracker and co-author of the report. “Unfortunately, however, we see that none are currently aligned with the goals of the Paris agreement.” The authors examined the firms’ exploration and production plans, investments, carbon emission reduction targets and executive bonus policies, placing the results on a Paris alignment scorecard. They assigned each company a letter grade from A to H, wherein an A is “potentially aligned” with the Paris agreement goals and H is the “furthest from being aligned”, with activities and strategy consistent with cataclysmic warming of 2.4C above pre-industrial levels. By the authors’ metrics, each company received a failing grade. There are “are clear differences between companies”, however, O’Connor noted. The highest ranked company, BP, received a D grade. Saudi Aramco, Brazil’s Petrobras, and ExxonMobil received G grades, and at the bottom was ConocoPhillips, the only firm to receive an H. BP, Saudi Aramco, Petrobras, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips were not immediately available for comment. Every firm assessed besides the gas company Chesapeake Energy has plans to expand fossil-fuel production in the near term, the analysis found. BP is the only company aiming to cut its fossil fuel production by 2030, while just three companies – Spain’s Repsol, Norway’s Equinor, and the UK-based Shell – have plans to keep production levels flat, the report found. ConocoPhillips, meanwhile, is aiming to increase production by 47% by the end of the decade, compared with its 2022 output, according to the analysis. The analysis comes as oil and gas companies are publicly reneging on their climate commitments. Shell last week watered down earlier emissions targets, following BP, which made a similar announcement last year. In October, ExxonMobil also made a deal to buy the shale group Pioneer Natural Resources, while Chevron announced plans to acquire the Texas oil company Hess – marking two of the country’s largest oil and gas deals in decades. Previous studies have also found that big oil’s climate plans are insufficient to achieve global climate goals, including 2023 analysis from research and advocacy group Oil Change International. Both reports, said David Tong, global industry campaign manager at Oil Change International, provide evidence that “governments must step in to manage the phaseout of the oil and gas industry”. “No one would trust an arsonist promising to light fewer fires, and no one should trust big oil and gas climate pledges and plans,” he said. The report launch also coincided with the annual Cera Week in Houston, where oil and gas executives have been deriding fossil fuel phaseout efforts and timelines. Carbon Tracker says its new report could help hold executives accountable. “This new scorecard enables investors to assess companies’ actions relative to peers, and to ask tough questions of company leadership on the realities of the energy transition and addressing climate change,” said Mike Coffin, head of oil, gas and mining research at the thinktank. I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism as we enter one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes in 2024. With the potential of another Trump presidency looming, there are countless angles to cover around this year’s election – and we'll be there to shed light on each new development, with explainers, key takeaways and analysis of what it means for America, democracy and the world. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest – not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions – and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiraling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualize, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organization with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective – one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not. If you can, please consider supporting us just once from $1, or better yet, support us every month with a little more. Thank you. Betsy Reed Editor, Guardian US
|
